Sunday, June 6, 2021

Chicago Pizzas: Is There Really A "Best?"

For those of you who have never been, Chicago is a beautiful city that is famous for a lot of things: “The Bean” in Millennium Park, Wrigley Field, Willis Tower (a.k.a. the former Sears Tower), the Navy Pier, the Field Museum, Second City Comedy, Michael Jordan's Bulls, the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre, and being the birthplace of everyone from Walt Disney and Hillary Rodham Clinton to Dwyane Wade and Kanye West, just to name a few. However, more importantly, it is also the birthplace of the deep-dish pizza, and that’s why we’re here – because I recently had a chance to visit Chicago, and I went around taste-testing the various pizzas that had been recommended to me by folks who either had grown up in the Chicago area or whom previously visited Chi-Town.

Now granted, the wife and I were only in town for four days, so taste-testing them ALL would be dang-near impossible – especially since Chicago’s type of pizza is so very filling! – but we at least tried to hit up one different pizza spot each day. This was the list of pizza places we were hoping to get to (in alphabetical order): Gino’s East, Giordano’s, Lou Malnati’s, Nancy’s, Pequod’s, Pizano’s, and finally, Pizzeria Uno (or “UNO Pizzeria & Grill,” as it’s known outside of Chicago). We got to four and a half of those. I now FINALLY understand why Chicagoans can never agree on their preferred pizza vendor – it's because all the places listed here focus on totally different aspects of the pizza experience!

Giordano's: The Cheese Lover's Favorite

If you like cheese, Giordano’s is definitely the place for you. They stuff soooo much cheese in their deep dish that it makes sense why they’ve become arguably the most mainstream Chicago pizza place out there, considering pretty much everyone that loves pizza, loves cheese. However, this pizza is also among the priciest of the bunch probably because of the fact that they’ve become so mainstream!

Case and point...

So on day one of our trip, after getting settled in, the wife and I walked over to the Navy Pier. We had actually planned on hitting up a Giordano’s that was located just around the corner from our hotel, but were pleasantly surprised to find one located inside the Navy Pier we were already visiting.

So when we got there, we immediately put ourselves on the waiting list and told the lady at the register what it was we’d like to order (they told us it would be 45-60 minutes before it’d be our turn, and then they’d start baking our pizza, which would take another 45 minutes).

So with plenty of time to kill, which we were planning on doing at the pier that day anyway, we shopped at some of its stores (which turned out to be quite useful, considering we bought some Chicago souvenirs for our family members there, as well as some Chicago Cubs merchandise for the game we’d be attending at Wrigley Field the next day), we rode the famous Ferris Wheel out back and listened to some live music on an outdoor stage overlooking Lake Michigan.

When finally it was our turn to go eat, it was well worth the wait, as this cheesy delight was what was awaiting us…

However, if cheese ain’t your thing because you fancy yourself more of a sauce person, then you should probably avoid Giordano’s, and head instead to…

Lou Malnati's: The Sauce Lover's Favorite

Though this restaurant chain is also ridiculously well known, their ingredients taste fresher and more hand-made. In fact, their whole ambience is that of a homely family-run business, as evidenced by the family photos adorning the tables within their iconic Wrigley Building on Michigan Avenue.

Considering how many Chicagoans have raved about this place to me, I was truly surprised by the fact that it was among the cheapest of the five pizza bills I saw.

The wait time at all these places is pretty much the same, considering they’re baking an inside-out pizza wherein the sauce sits atop the cheese, which sits atop the toppings, which sits atop the crust. You can always expect to wait anywhere from 1-2 hours as they make it, so what you do instead is what we did, just put your name on their list, give them your order in advance, then turn your dinner plans inside-out as well by doing dessert BEFORE dinner. No, seriously, Ghirardelli’s chocolate is in the neighboring building, so after we notched our place in line, we then notched our place in front of a hot fudge sundae, reserving a little room in our bellies for this saucy yumminess that was to follow…

Frankly, we were lucky to have eaten here at all, since the place had only just re-opened two weeks earlier from their COVID-19 pandemic shutdown. Hooray for the pizza gods on that one!

Now, if neither the pizza’s cheese nor sauce are what hook you, then maybe you’re more of a crust lover? If that’s the case, avoid the aforementioned two, and instead work your way over to the little hole in the wall that is...

Pequod's: The Crust Lover's Favorite

This place is a little out there in more ways than one. First, for tourists, it’s probably a little further out geographically then most of the other pizza places on this list, but it’s well worth the drive, trust me! Also, the logo is very funny, but odd, as the late owner was a bit eccentric and liked to bring the literary world into his entrepreneurial food chains. (More on that below.) And lastly, that same owner, Burt Katz, was a master baker, so he got uber-creative when deciding what his pizzas would taste like moving forward. Fortunately, we now get to reap the benefits of that innovative spirit at this locale.

So first, let’s go back to that funky logo mentioned above. It features a whale with a thong on its head, thereby becoming – hands down – the most unique logo in this bunch of pizza chains (and possibly also among all the pizza chains in the world). In case you don’t get it, the name Pequod’s is a reference to Capt. Ahab’s 19th-century Nantucket whaling ship in Moby Dick, which continued a stream of literary references for Pequod’s now-deceased founder, as Katz’s previous restaurants included the now-closed Inferno (as in Dante’s Inferno) and the still-going Gulliver’s (named for Gulliver’s Travels). The thong part of the logo came about in the ‘90s, when the pizza chain’s ownership decided to come up with wacky marketing ploys, one of which was to sell women’s thongs at the bar, a practice that they’ve since sadly stopped doing. End of a very weird era!

So anyway, back to what makes this pizza so imaginative. It’s all in the crust! While working at other food places in his early restaurant days, Burt used to mess around with the crust to see if he can make them taste better. Remember the days when people used to just dispose of their crusts after eating a pizza? Well, Burt Katz is probably the reason they no longer do that – because he brought actual taste to our crusts. After experimenting with several different mixtures, he finally picked his favorite, and the winner was his caramelized formula. This delicious addition gives Pequod’s pizzas a crunchy feel that other places just can’t reproduce – at least, not this well!

Bonus points: Since this place is still essentially a hole in the wall and requires a wee-bit of travel to get to, it’s the least known of the bunch, and therefore serves the most inexpensive of all these pies.

I’m sure all Chicagoans are yelling at me by now, since I have yet to mention their precious Gino’s East. Don’t get your whale panties in a bunch, my friends, I’m getting there!

Gino's East: The Topping Lover's Favorite

So how exactly do I explain Gino’s East? It’s all about atmosphere at this pizza place. It’s also about word-of-mouth hype. Lots and lots of word of mouth! All the celebrities who visit Chicago absolutely rave about this place, so much so that the original location on Superior Street, right in the heart of the Magnificent Mile, even features a very long hallway of autographed celebrity headshots, all of which are signed praising this establishment. Here’s just one portion of it, so that you can see just some of the presidents, royals and billionaire entertainers that have visited this spot…

In case that wasn’t enough to get you in the door, Gino’s started working with T.V. shows in the ‘90s to build them up even more. Some of you my age may remember that episode of Sister, Sister where Tamera drives for hours to go with some acquaintances to score Gino’s East pizza all the way in Chicago (from Detroit, for those of you unfamiliar with the show). Really, Gino’s East does a great job with their marketing!

They also do a great job of creating a hands-on atmosphere at their original location, as they allow guests to graffiti up their walls (upon request), creating a fun venue that feels like an anti-establishment local music scene hangout, but which costs enough for the actual establishment to be okay with promoting this chain, as well. In other words, they’ve got the perfect balance figured out to unite all the classes...

However, how does the actual food stack up? Is it really worth all that hype?! Well, I will say this – they’ve got ample menu items to choose from, so you don’t necessarily have to stick to just the deep-dish pizza here. In fact, I don’t even think that pizza is their best menu item, as the locals seem to prefer Gino’s chicken wings over their deep dish. But if you do decide to go the pizza route at this joint, at least know that you will have some very interesting things topping your buttercrust creation.

On our recent visit, for instance, the wife and I ordered the Buffalo Chicken pizza, which came adorned with all the usual stuff, but it also came topped with chopped red onions, celery and carrot relish. I’m not one for attempting to “health” up my gluttonous carb intake, so maybe I just don’t get the pizzas at this place – maybe that’s more down your alley, though? – but I do appreciate having so many choices from which to select my meal, even if it does come at a heftier cost...

Now, remember when I said we visited four and a half Chicago pizza chains? What I meant by that was that we planned it out well enough to make it to five of our preferred seven, and we fully intended to visit five (with Pizzeria Uno being the fifth local spot we were going to hit up), but then suddenly, life happened. When it came time to tackle the fifth chain, we were simply too stuffed from all the previous pizzas we’d eaten, and we also realized we had forsaken all the equally-famous hot dog places in the area, so we had to make a split decision. We didn’t have enough space for Uno's, but we had just about enough space for Portillo’s hot dogs, so we went there instead. (My lord, those hot dogs are good!)

But anyway, we rectified our decision by not completely giving up on tasting that fifth pizza. We told ourselves that we'd be traveling to Orlando the very next weekend, and we already knew Orlando has its own UNO locations, so we'd just hit up that fifth chain in O-Town rather than in Chi-Town, when in the "Magic City" rather than when in the "Windy City," and that's exactly what we did! Hence, we visited five Chicago pizza spots because of our four-day trip to Ferris Bueller's playground. But since not all five pizzas were actually tasted in Chicago, that's why we only ate at four and a half Chicago pizza spots.

Pizzeria Uno (UNO Pizzeria & Grill): Chicago's First "Rockstar" Pizza

The title of this section doesn't mean that Uno's has the best pizza, as any of the four chains mentioned above will definitely give them a run for their money in that department. It just means that they are generally believed to be the first Chicago chain to create a deep-dish pizza, and as such, they became the first to make a national media splash.

The first Uno's was established in 1943 by former University of Texas football star Ike Sewell and his former World War II G.I. friend Ric Riccardo in the River North neighborhood of Chicago. While Sewell and Riccardo are known as the owners of the original restaurant, a 1956 article from the Chicago Daily News asserts that the original deep-dish pizza recipe was created by chef Rudy Malnati Sr., the father of Lou Malnati.

Controversy always seems to follow Chicago pizza successes, though, as people still also bicker back and forth over whether stuffed pizza was the May 1971 creation of Rocco and Annunziata "Nancy" Palese at Guy's Pizza, the couple who later went on to open the Nancy's pizzeria chain and who claim to have based this new pizza style on Rocco's mother's recipe for scarciedda, an Easter specialty pie that was all the rage in Turin (Italy), or whether it was created in the summer of 1974 by Efren and Joseph Boglio, the founding brothers of Giordano's, who were bringing new life to their own Italian mother's scarciedda recipe. No matter who you believe in that sordid affair, the end result of getting to devour a super cheesy pizza makes everyone happy!

But anyway, I digress, let's go back to talking about Uno's now...

Whatever you believe, one thing is almost certain: none of the above four chains would have ever picked up steam and gone mainstream(-ish) had it not been for the sort of “rockstar" status that Uno's gained in the media. Whether you know it as Pizzeria Uno (because you’re actually from Chicago where they still only have two locations, aptly named “Pizzeria Uno” and “Pizzeria Due” – or “Pizzeria One” and “Pizzeria Two,” for you non-Italian speakers) or as UNO Pizzeria & Grill (because you’re from outside the Chicago area, and that’s the name they branded themselves with across the rest of the nation), you’ve definitely at least heard of this chain, even if you haven’t eaten there. No matter who created the recipe that led to it, UNO was definitely the chain that made "Chicago-style pizza" a term.

So that being said, how's their pie taste nowadays? Honestly, it's good and family-friendly, but I wouldn't say it's great at any one particular thing like I would with the other four places I visited for this write-up. It's a fairly standard run-of-the-mill Chicago pizza at this point, and here's what it looks like...

But because of its fame as the founder of the Chicago style of deep-dishing, it still charges accordingly, placing itself right in the middle of the price wars with these other pizza chains...

However, if we're being honest, the best thing we had at this place was the dessert, which was just massive! For sweet-tooths like us, a giant chunk of chocolate cake was enough to leave us satisfied with making that extra post-Chicago pizza chain visit.

So, in conclusion, I guess what I'm trying to say is... when it comes to Chicago pizzas, there really is no correct answer as to which one's better. That's all a matter of taste. There are four parts to a deep-dish pizza and there are four chains that we visited in Chicago that do those four things amazingly, so depending on what you like, just pick the chain that matches – for sauce, Lou Malnati's; for cheese, Giordano's; for toppings, Gino's East; or for crust, Pequod's. Now, if you just want a simple family gathering over a pizza nobody will have a problem with, then maybe heading on down to Uno's would be the best bet for you. Either way, you can't go wrong with Chicago-style pizza!

Which Was My Favorite (& Why)?

For those of you who want my Chicago pizza rankings – and again, this doesn't make it fact, just my personal preference – I'd probably rank them as such: (1) Pequod's, (2) Lou Malnati's, (3) Giordano's, (4) Gino's East & (5) Pizzeria Uno. Why did I like Pequod's best? Well, I already mentioned their delicious caramelized crust and their lower pricing, but I also feel like they had just the perfect amount of cheese, sauce and toppings, whereas my other two favorites overdid certain sections of their pizzas. In other words, the fact that Lou Malnati's used too much sauce and that Giordano's used too much cheese dropped them just a hair below Pequod's for me. However, all five of these chains are delicious, so go ahead and start digging in at anyone of them whenever you're ready!

Wednesday, January 6, 2021

What Has Happened To Us As A Country?

The temperature really needs to be turned down in Washington D.C. right now...

Sunday, April 5, 2020

Best Teams Ever?

So Yahoo!, one of the least reliable sources of sports news ever, recently ran reader's polls to determine who were the best sports teams in every sport Americans like to watch.

Here were their results...

NFL (Yahoo!'s Winner: '85 Bears)

I mean, the '72 Dolphins beat every single team put on their schedule, and you're telling me they don't even make the finals of this thing? Man, how do you do better than undefeated?! Every single team that faced off with them found a new way to lose -- and something tells me the '85 Bears would have been no different. Yeah, they didn't have some stupid shuffle dance like the '85 Bears (that's 'cause Shula was too hard-nosed to allow that), and they didn't have big names like the Bears ("Sweetness" Walter Payton, Jim McMahon, William "Refrigerator" Perry, etc.), but what they did have is a big fat zero in the loss column, which meant exemplary team work. Furthermore, the only loss those '85 Bears suffered were to the '85 Dolphins, and if they can lose to THOSE Dolphins, they can certainly lose to the REAL Dolphins. I think the '72 Dolphins squad should have taken the NFL bracket. For them to not even make the finals is just downright disrespectful!

MLB (Yahoo!'s Winner: '27 Yankees)

This one I don't take as much offense with, because honestly, I wasn't around to see those '27 Yankees play. And the line-up pitched in their article tells me that team consisted of such names as Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig, just to name a few. So yeah, even though I've seen the "Big Red Machine" and never imagined another team being their equal, esp. with Pete Rose being on a whole 'nother level that year, I can definitely see this 1927 "Murderer's Row" line-up causing major headaches for our boys in Cincinnati, so I won't debate this one too harshly. Plus, these '27 Yanks were the only pre-1970s team to win one of these brackets, so there really MUST be something here for recency bias not to affect the 1927 squad at all. This one's probably correct!

NBA (Yahoo!'s Winner: '96 Bulls)

The 2017 Warriors in the finals, really? That is so lame, and so untruthful! First of all, they weren't even the best team that year, as they lost in the NBA Finals (need I really remind you of that?). Secondly, they shouldn't have even made it out of the first round, as those 1989 "Bad Boy Pistons" would have knocked this soft squad into tomorrow. You're seriously telling me that you think Draymond can bully up a goon like Bill Laimbeer? You're seriously telling me that Isiah Thomas, Joe Dumars, Mark Aguirre and company are going to just sit back and let the Warriors pop off 100 three's per game? That would have never happened back in the day! Get your soft modern-day NBA ball out of these all-time finals! Any of those three teams in the Final Four would have busted Steph and Klay up. Neither Wilt ('72 Lakers), Larry ('86 Celtics) nor Michael ('96 Bulls) took much crap on the basketball court, but esp. not Michael. That guy -- alongside Pippen, Kukoc and Rodman -- would've kicked the crud out of the "Splash Brothers." M.J. for the win... in pretty much anything basketball related!

NHL (Yahoo!'s Winner: '85 Oilers)

I'm sorry, they had the '85 Oilers winning this thing, but even that's wrong! I understand the Gretzky love -- dude is the G.O.A.T., plain and simple! However, that '77 Canadiens team only lost eight games all season! Do you know how ridiculous that is to pull off? If anybody in the modern game pulled that off, they'd coast through this tournament in a landslide, and the same should be the case for Montreal!

Here are the other six brackets, which I won't comment on for now...

NCAAF (Yahoo!'s Winner: '95 Nebraska)

NCAAB (Yahoo!'s Winner: '73 UCLA)

NCAAW (Yahoo!'s Winner: '02 UConn)

WNBA (Yahoo!'s Winner: '00 Comets)

Soccer (Yahoo!'s Winner: '09 Barcelona)

NASCAR (Yahoo!'s Winner: '98 Gordon)

Friday, July 26, 2019

Macho's dead, Snake's the Champ!

October 21, 1991 gave me one of the greatest wrestling memories from my childhood, and here it is revisited with Jake (my favorite wrestler as a kid) doing the best Randy Savage impersonation I've ever heard...

Thursday, July 25, 2019

Looks Pretty Good for Being 65 Million Years Old!

"The moment Harrison Duran saw the base of a horn piercing into the ground of the North Dakota Badlands, he knew what he had found. The partial skull of a 65 million-year-old Triceratops."

To read more on this awesome story, please click here.

Sunday, July 21, 2019

Apollo 11 & Artemis 3

Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin both walked on the moon on this date in 1969, as part of the Apollo 11 mission, but this lesser-known hero was right there with them, 50 years ago today!



And now, thanks to an order President Donald Trump has signed, it looks like we will have our next man and our first woman heading back to the moon in 2024 as part of Artemis 3. I am so stoked to learn of that news!

For those that don't know, Artemis is Apollo's twin sister in Greek mythology, and they're the kids of Zeus and Leto, both of whom I'm sure would be very proud of the American space program if gods could be American citizens. LOL!

Keep up the great work, NASA, I'm a big fan!

For more information on what the Artemis 3 mission will entail, click here.

Thursday, June 27, 2019

The Top 20 Democratic Candidates

I will begin this blog the same way I began it three years ago when it was the Republicans bringing all their top candidates onto a stage to debate, and that is by stating that I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat, but rather an Independent voter that can swing either way, or neither way, if I so choose.

That being said, I just got done watching 20 candidates throughout two nights of Democratic presidential debates on NBC, otherwise known to me as The Blacklist's network...

(Keep in mind, I was not a political science or foreign affairs major in college, so I'm not exactly Mr. Politico, but rather just a guy with a small voice who likes to hear himself think and make himself laugh.)

My initial reaction on each (in purely alphabetical order)?

Amy Klobuchar - I heard she was one of the more moderate voices in this pack, so I honestly thought I might like her candidacy early on, but then I saw her non-stop elitist smirk and read the rumors of her being an undercover bully and throwing staplers, etc., at her interns, so now I just think she's full of it.

Andrew Yang - As a former techie, this dude is clearly too cool to wear a tie to the debate, which is a major etiquette faux pas, but I kind of like people who buck tradition, so really, that's just a passing observation. However, while not exactly using these words, Mr. Yang essentially went on to say that he'll give everybody $1,000 if they vote him into office, so I already for sure know two things about this guy: (1) His policies are going to be way too idealistic to be realistic (Where are we going to generate this free money from? How much will our taxes have to go up to cover that?), and (2) I may just have to vote for him because they just upped my rent. LOL!

Bernie Sanders - Everybody already knows Bernie, so I'll just make a joke about our favorite grumpy Jewish grandpa in this space. Hearing him speak tonight, I kind of feel like the guy thinks that if we don't pass "Medicare for All," the world will end tomorrow! It's that important to him, even though it's unrealistic in my eyes. I mean, c'mon, we can barely cover the people we have on Medicare now, so how in the heck are we going to offer that to everybody and have enough of it to go around?!

Beto O'Rourke - Something about this guy depresses me. I don't know if it's the tone of his voice, the fact that he loves talking about prisons so dang much, or that he's clearly out of his league in these debates, but I almost feel like we should add a sad, slow violin to the background every time he speaks.

Bill de Blasio - The guy is posturing, plain and simple. He's the king of New York and he wants you to know it. Frankly, I couldn't give two $#!+s! (Plus, he may have just killed his campaign by uttering the revolutionary phrase "Hasta la victoria, siempre!" in Miami. Goes to show that being the king of New York means diddly squat in Miami.)

Cory Booker - By his own admission, he's pretty much only fighting for the black and brown minorities, which I guess bodes well for Hispanic me, but still, I don't agree with it. I also don't agree with somebody taking $200,000 from big pharma, allowing them to raise the costs of our prescription drugs, and then turning around, looking me in the eyes, and claiming he would stand up to the pharmaceutical companies during his presidency. Yeah, sure you will!

Elizabeth Warren - She's the female Bernie Sanders: all passion, no substance. Plus, she has that Native American lie forever staining her path to the White House. If you don't believe me, just ask Trump, who already calls her "Pocahontas." She is a great speaker, though, I'll give her that much!

Eric Swalwell - The dude that looks like T.V. serial killer Dexter Morgan wants us to give him all of our assault weapons? If it was somebody else asking, I might've considered it, but with him looking the way he does, thank you, but I think I'll pass.

Jay Inslee - In his own head, he was the first to do everything and is most certainly the strongest woman candidate in this entire field. Delusional much?

Joe Biden - "Issues," you say?! "What issues? Barack and I've already fixed everything! I've been around forever and I've always done everything right, now where's your daughter at, so that I can sniff her hair?" Honestly, to me, this guy seems so creepy with that fake smile of his, his one son marrying his deceased son's ex-wife, and that whole Anita Hill fiasco. Too much baggage, if you ask me, but for some reason, America loves this man (and this man really loves himself, too, so just imagine the narcissistic battles we would have between Trump and him if he were to win the vote)!

John Delaney - This guy's got goofy eyes for days, and he keeps interrupting everybody at the oddest times. He and Tim Ryan have got no shot in hell after their atrocious showings in that first debate.

John Hickenlooper - "I'm a big progressive." He actually said that in his closing statement. And he's so big, in fact, that nobody's ever heard of him. Keep up the good work, background filler! (P.S.: If his satellite ears could team up with Delaney's eyes -- yowsers!)

Julian Castro - In my post-debates opinion, he's arguably the second-best candidate in this field of 20 right now. However, he's also got Marco Rubio-level pandering skills. When he started speaking in Spanish for his closing statement, that was the most transparent Latino @$$-kissing I've ever seen!

Kamala Harris - A few weeks ago, she said reparations should be a thing in 2020, meaning people who weren't around during the slavery days, have always gotten along well with all minorities, and who -- at least in my case -- had no family living in the U.S. when all that nonsense was going on, would have to pay Sen. Harris and all other African-Americans for just being here in America at this point in time. She completely lost any chance of receiving my vote when she said that. However, she did have a pretty good debate tonight, as she slyly kept telling everybody that they had great ideas and that she respects them, while always following those compliments up with subtle smear campaigns on the very same candidates. In other words, she's definitely a politician!

Kirsten Gillibrand - She took a break from starring in Frozen to come out and fight for women's issues, which is always a good cause. The only problem I have with that is that she seems to think she's the only woman to ever fight for women's issues. As Sen. Klobuchar said just one night before, there're a few other women in this race that have fought pretty hard for women's issues, as well, so you can get off your high horse there, Elsa!

Marianne Williamson - She's not sure how to answer a single question, but promises that she will get our imaginations going the way JFK did. Congrats on winning the "Worst Performance of the Second Night of Debates Award!"

Michael Bennet - It's okay to open your mouth when you talk, Michael, that way you can stop stuttering. Honestly, I didn't understand a word this guy said all night, so I really like his odds of winning this nomination. [/sarcasm]

Pete Buttigieg - This dude actually sounded like he knows his stuff, and he's a war veteran! No wonder he's on the fast-track to the presidency!

Tim Ryan - Sounded like the dimmest person while sharing a stage with the likes of Delaney and O'Rourke. That takes a lot of effort. Dude got repeatedly shutdown by everybody and actually thought it was the Taliban (not al-Qaeda!) that attacked us on 9/11. He also came off as being super aggressive. I predict he'll be the first of these 20 candidates to pull out of the race because there's just no coming back from such an awful performance.

Tulsi Gabbard - A lot of people were talking smack about her after Night 1 of these debates, but I actually think she seemed like a good candidate, to be honest with you. She's kind of a centrist in her beliefs, considering her social conservative background, and has a strong military past, both of which I feel are much needed traits in our 2020 president. However, knowing how much Trump loves to market himself, I don't think she'd have much of a shot at beating him, because she does seem way too reserved for such a battle.

Now that I've run through every candidate individually, let me add my two cents about both debate nights. On Night 1, I would say that either Julian Castro, Elizabeth Warren or Amy Klobuchar "won" the debate in the eyes of the Democratic voter. I'm clearly not that, though. I'm more of a centrist/moderate, and as such, the only one that really seemed like a decent candidate to me was Tulsi Gabbard, but I know she won't win the Democratic vote because (A) she's already angered the LGBTQ community, and (B) like I said above, her personality is way too reserved to compete against a blowhard like Trump's. I also didn't mind HUD Secretary Castro so much, though. He'd probably be my second preference out of the first 10 candidates because he, unlike the others, didn't seem like such a socialist. And by the way, if you want President Trump's opinion, he thought they were all "BORING!" It's politics, Agent Orange, what'd you expect?! As for Night 2, Mayor Pete easily won that debate. I would say Andrew Yang came in a distant second, and Kamala Harris followed closely in third, at least from my perspective. Still, Yang, to me, sounds like a guy with great ideas on paper, but they just aren't fiscally realistic.

So after two days, I guess these are the four candidates I wouldn't mind voting for, if I absolutely had to vote Democrat and it was required that I vote right now: (1) Pete Buttigieg, (2) Julian Castro, (3) Tulsi Gabbard and (4) Andrew Yang. However, that is definitely not the order I think America is going to have them ranked by next week, when the latest poll numbers will be made available to us. If I had to predict that order, I'd probably venture to guess something more along these lines: (1) Joe Biden, (2) Bernie Sanders, (3) Elizabeth Warren, (4) Pete Buttigieg, (5) Julian Castro, (6) Kamala Harris, (7) Beto O'Rourke, (8) Cory Booker, (9) Bill de Blasio and (10) Amy Klobuchar.

However, speaking strictly as an independent voter that equally dislikes both parties, this is what I, too, am hearing from the Democrats as I watch these televised debates, so I really hope they dial it back a bit in future debates and get a bit closer to center, as really, that is what I feel America will mostly need from its president in 2020...

Honestly, if they stay this course, I still think Trump will beat all of them, because he's really good about highlighting his populist beliefs. This reaction (from tonight's debate) in particular sticks out to me...

Dial it back a bit, Dems, if you want to have a shot at connecting with non-partied voters like myself. Trust me, as someone whose family left a socialist country and (legally) moved to America, going down socialism's path is not going to win you much sympathy with us Latino voters. It really isn't!

Please, for the sake of all that is holy, let's try to make America great again by meeting back at the middle, politically. This country used to be great, and then it split right down the middle, and now we're bordering on civil war with one another. We need somebody now who can bring us back together in 2020, a Lincoln/FDR/JFK-type leader, not an orange reality T.V. star or a creepy Joe Biden or a socialist Bernie.

Let's all come together and do the best we can for Lady Liberty and Uncle Sam in 2020! Let's elect a truly good candidate for a change, not just another somebody who is a big name looking to continue their leftist or right-wing agenda!